President Barack Obama is a fool. I so declare while we celebrate freedom and independence, the 4th of July.
|
|
That being said, we now have the man who had never even visited Tijuana, Mexico, or any place in Latin America before he became president making announcements on events in Honduras driven by people seeking to protect a constitutional government under siege from leftist dictators in Venezuela and Nicaragua.
President Barack Obama has joined these leftist dictators in attempting to further an illegal move by a leftist politician to entrench one more leftist dictatorship into the Central American social and political fabric.
President Obama probably didn’t even know where Honduras was before he made his stupid statements against the takeover of the government by anti-leftist forces.
Barack Obama has forfeited his claim to being a Democrat by supporting Nicaragua’s and Venezuela’s attempt to eliminate democracy in Honduras, a nation that stood by the United States and its surrogates in the successful fight for a democratic Nicaragua. He even had his minions in the United Nations sponsor a resolution that stated that the removal of President Manuel Zelaya by democratic forces in Honduras interrupted the democratic and constitution order and the legitimate exercise of power in Honduras.
Here are the facts: Manuel Zelaya was elected president of Honduras in a democratic election in which he ran as a center-right business-oriented candidate. Some time later, he switched sides and became a populist leftist under the influence of Venezuela’s leftist Hugo Chavez and Nicaragua’s newly elected Daniel Ortega of the thuggish communist Sandinista Party.
At their suggestion, Zelaya ordered a convention to rewrite the Honduran constitution to allow him to run for re-election. However, only the Honduran Congress can call for a constitutional convention. Zelaya failed to even get his party to support such a rewrite. Zelaya then proclaimed that he would call for a referendum to rewrite the Constitution like Hugo Chavez did in Venezuela. Chavez paid for ballot printing in Venezuela and shipped them to Honduras.
The Honduran Supreme Court ruled Zelaya’s referendum illegal. When the country’s top soldier informed Zelaya that he would not enforce illegal orders from Zelaya, Zelaya fired him. Zelaya then led an armed mob provided by Nicaragua’s Ortega and Venezuela’s Chavez to steal the impounded illegal ballots.
On the last Sunday of June, the Army took over the presidential palace, arrested Zelaya and sent him by plane into exile in neighboring Costa Rica. Zelaya promised he would return.
He tried. On a plane financed by Hugo Chavez, he flew from Washington, D.C., to Honduras where the Army prevented the plane from landing. He sits in exile sputtering that he will return.
As the New York Daily News put it: It was Zelaya, who in his avowal to ignore a supreme court decision and proceed with an illegal power grab, subverted his country's democracy. Nevertheless, the (Obama) Pentagon cut off all cooperation with the Honduran military and Obama administration officials told The New York Times of their intention to give the poverty-stricken Central American nation "a taste of isolation." Would they threaten such consequences for the mullahs in Iran?
Barack Obama has failed democracy. He has joined the mullahs, Daniel Ortega and Hugo Chavez in attempting to raise dictatorship above that of a free democratic constitutional government.
The Daily News continues: Secretary of State Clinton said that Honduras' actions "should be condemned by all" and President Obama said that his administration would "stand with democracy" by supporting Zelaya's reinstatement. Propping up an authoritarian undermining his country's constitution (which he claimed needs fixing to reflect a new "national reality," apparently one in which he rules forever) is a strange way to demonstrate that solidarity.
Fidel Castro gloats about American support for Zelaya with, "Even Mrs. Clinton had declared that Zelaya is the only president of Honduras, and the Honduran coup leaders can't even breathe wihout the support of the United States."
We shall see, Mrs. Clinton; we shall see, Mr. Obama.
(Contreras books are available at amazon.com)






Comments
Rush Dumbucket wrote on Jul 16, 2009 5:32 PM:
Dear Mr. Lowery wrote on Jul 11, 2009 3:29 PM:
Mr. Zelaya is very unpopular in his country, and downright loathed by some. His referendum would have failed by probability and term would have been ended by popular demand. He was stupid to try to grab power like Chavez, but his people did not like him like Venezuelans at some point liked Chavez.
But these sensible reasons do not ring true in bizarro land. If you just yell, Chavez! Castro! Socialist! Communist! to a bunch of people (especially those who would gather at a Right Wing Tea Party) you will get a rise out of them, because these same people, like you, don't bother to read newspapers and just listen to Fox and Rush Limbaugh.
There is more to foreign policy than what Newt and Rush say you know. There is a whole lot more. "
Nostalgic wrote on Jul 10, 2009 1:26 PM:
Your passionate essay makes me long for the ideals of Battalion 310 and for the wonderful decades when Honduras was ruled by a ruthless military dictatorship, funded and trained by the CIA.
As for President Obama, here is what he said: “We believe that the coup was not legal and that President Zelaya remains the president of Honduras, the democratically elected president there.”
Obama said this to reporters after an Oval Office meeting with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe.
Uribe is a conservative, but along with the leaders of the other 33 nations of the Organization of American States Uribe has joined in unanimously condemning what is, in fact, a military coup.
Which makes the inflammatory comments on right-wing websites (whose words so much resemble your own) misleading to say the least.
Like this one: “Obama sides with Castro and Chavez,” says Newt Gingrich.
(Psst, Newt! You left out Uribe!)
You write: "..Honduras, a nation that stood by the United States and its surrogates in the successful fight for a democratic Nicaragua."
By "surrogates" I assume you mean the notorious "Contras?" Like as in "The Iran-Contra Affair" and the Contras' training of death squads throughout Central America?
Finally, if the fight for a democratic Nicaragua was "successful" what is your difficulty in accepting its current democratically elected president, Daniel Ortega? "
George Wilgers wrote on Jul 10, 2009 10:25 AM: